Date:         Fri, 4 Aug 1995 08:53:36 +0800
Reply-To:     The NOMAD2 Discussion List
Sender:       The NOMAD2 Discussion List
From:         Antony Man
Subject:      Re: VM Storage Sizes for Shared DB server id's
In-Reply-To:  "Mail dated 95/08/03 20:29:20 UT from (NOMAD2-L) The NOMAD2
              Discussion List"

Yes. Increasing the server storage will definitely improve the performanc
especially when the database size is large. In fact, all of our NOMAD
server run in 16M storage.



Regards,

Antony MAN
___Original Letter _______________________________________
Date: 03 Aug 1995 22:49:12 +0800
Sender:   The NOMAD2 Discussion List           (NOMAD2-L)
From:     Stace Cameron                        (SCAMERON)
To:       Multiple recipients of list NOMAD2-L (NOMAD2-L)
Reply-To: The NOMAD2 Discussion List           (NOMAD2-L)
Subject: VM Storage Sizes for Shared DB server id's

We are in the process of migrating to VM/ESA from HPO.
I remember seeing somewhere a recommendation to increase the
storage sizes, especially for the shared DB server id's. Does anyone
who has gone through this experience have any advice on this subject?
The majority of all of our cms ids are set with a logon storage size
of 2M.  Is it true that increasing the shared DB servers storage will
improve system performance or would we just be wasting resources
(given that the systems are running now on HPO).

Thanks.

Stace Cameron
Southern Illinois University - School of Medicine
scameron@siumed.edu
___End of Original Letter_________________________________
back to index