Date:         Thu, 3 Aug 1995 13:28:59 -0700
Reply-To:     The NOMAD2 Discussion List
Sender:       The NOMAD2 Discussion List
From:         Stephanie Leigh
Subject:      Re: VM Storage Sizes for Shared DB server id's
In-Reply-To:  "Mail dated 95/08/03 20:23:26 UT from (NOMAD2-L) The NOMAD2
              Discussion List"

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE IMPROVES ABOVE 16M FOR NOMAD, BUT ANYTHING OVER 16M
ALSO CREATES ITS OWN PROBLEMS WITH POST AND FTP CAPABILITIES; THE PEOPLE
TO GET THE FULL INFORMATION FROM ARE ED ROOT, DAVID MCANALLY AND STEVE.

REGARDS,
STEPHANIE




>___Original Letter _______________________________________
>Date: 03 Aug 1995 07:49:12 -0700
>Sender:   The NOMAD2 Discussion List           (NOMAD2-L)
>From:     Stace Cameron                        (SCAMERON)
>To:       Multiple recipients of list NOMAD2-L (NOMAD2-L)
>Reply-To: The NOMAD2 Discussion List           (NOMAD2-L)
>Subject: VM Storage Sizes for Shared DB server id's
>
>We are in the process of migrating to VM/ESA from HPO.
>I remember seeing somewhere a recommendation to increase the
>storage sizes, especially for the shared DB server id's. Does anyone
>who has gone through this experience have any advice on this subject?
>The majority of all of our cms ids are set with a logon storage size
>of 2M.  Is it true that increasing the shared DB servers storage will
>improve system performance or would we just be wasting resources
>(given that the systems are running now on HPO).
>
>Thanks.
>
>Stace Cameron
>Southern Illinois University - School of Medicine
>scameron@siumed.edu
>___End of Original Letter_________________________________
back to index